
These events are so worth going to – the digital revolution has completely changed the whole experience of seeing broadcasts (or recordings of broadcasts) of live shows. The “surround-sound” makes you feel as though you’re in the same auditorium as the performers, and the pin-sharp pictures create an impression that not only are you witnessing performances first-hand but that you have been endowed with alien, telescopic eyesight, allowing you to zoom in on the most intimate moments. It’s terrific, and the cinema ticket prices are a fraction of those at the theatres. Also the NT programmes come with “extras” in the shape of a complementary interview with key practitioners in the interval – plus, in the case of “War Horse” a short and illuminating documentary about the creation of the astonishing puppets by the Handspring company.

“War Horse” onstage, be it live or broadcast, is a phenomenon of our age, and truly should not on any account be missed, whether or not you’re interested in theatre. I haven’t seen the film version, but from all I’ve heard in making it Stephen Spielberg rather missed the point. A simple short story written for children by Michael Morpurgo, it was adapted for the stage by Nick Stafford and worked up by Marianne Elliot, Tom Morris, Toby Sedgwick and the “Handspring” team for the Olivier stage at National Theatre, where they presented it back in 2007. The sheer scope of their imagination, and their years of trial and error have produced a profound experience quite different from any achievable by manipulating images in a film-editing suite. Things made of wood, string, metal and plastic will make you weep for their sheer beauty, and for the merciless pity of that huge, bewildering war.
Ironically, the human star of the Spielberg “War Horse” movie provides another marvellous, visceral “live” theatre experience in “Coriolanus”. Our Radagrad Tom Hiddleston has now confirmed his status as a major classical actor in this crisp, sparse production by Josie O’Rourke.
Hiddleston is utterly convincing as the iron-willed, super-fit, ice-cold military officer, incapable of stooping to negotiation with representatives of “the people”, and at the same time he allows us to see the man’s vulnerability, and his seething inner emotions.
Nonetheless, however well it’s performed, I reckon the play of “Coriolanus” has a bit missing – it suddenly rushes to a ridiculously abrupt ending. I’m getting an image of a south bank script conference, circa 1605.
Scene – an upper room, the Anchor tavern
R.Burbage: Hey Will, the usual?
W. Shakespeare: Ta, Dick I’m parched – yeah, a pint of the Southwark Dry Sack please. How are rehearsals?
R.B: Smashing, coming on a treat. It’s a great part – I love playing mean bastards. Have you brought the last act with you?
WS: Um…no, still adding a few final tweaks – you won’t need it for another week or so will you?
RB: You’re kidding – we need it tomorrow! For Christ’s sake Will we open on Tuesday!
WS: This coming Tuesday? I thought you said a week on Tuesday….
Hence, just as the drama seems to be building to a well-paced final sequence in which the themes of loyalty, leadership, and the place of family love in war-time politics might be resolved, our hero and his enemy-turned-ally Aufidius suddenly fall out again, have a scrap and Coriolanus gets killed. End of play.
Now, in the interval of NT Live “Coriolanus” we were treated to an interview with the director Josie O’Rourke by Emma Freud. I have great admiration for both these professionals, one a significant theatre director, the other a lively and entertaining journalist, someone I used to know and like enormously in her student days. So imagine my confusion when their discussion of the clear merits of Tom H’s acting talent, and of his eminent suitability for the part suddenly segued into a giggly discussion of his having just been voted “the sexiest man in the world”, and how of course his amazing physique and beauty had nothing to do with his being cast, tee-hee… Can you imagine the feminist lobby’s reaction to a male director and male journalist discussing a serious female artist in those terms? Like most Guardian-reading, Labour-voting, grammar school-educated chaps of my generation, I do strive to stand shoulder to shoulder with our sisters on such issues, but hang on, just occasionally one can’t help but detect the faintest, faintest whiff of… could the word be hypocrisy…?
There’s just space here to mention that the cast also includes one of the stars of the fabulous Danish TV series “Borgen”, Birgitte Hjort Sorenson – you know, the gorgeous blond who plays the TV reporter, the one with the lovely legs….what? Oh, sorry…
Anyway, I believe there are more digital transmissions of “War Horse” coming up soon, plus showings of other major productions, so do check out the NT Live website. At present there is no mention of “Coriolanus”, but the recordings must still exist, so it could well be worth making an enquiry.
http://ntlive.nationaltheatre.org.uk/productions/9460-war-horse
And so, once more back to the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art. I’ve been at Gower St three times this week, twice to run workshops with the technical students, and yesterday to catch a matinee of the not-too-often performed “The Witch of Edmonton”, a play knocked up in 1621 by a trio of writers – Decker, Ford and Rowley.
Well it’s a cracker, and this version is brilliantly directed by Philip Franks and designed by Adrian Linford. There’s no point in my going on too much about this production as it’s now finished its run, but the play is scheduled for inclusion the next RSC season at Stratford, so look out for it there. Unlike many modern dress versions of Jacobean classics, this one allowed the use of mobile phones, etc and absorbed them brilliantly into the story-telling (unlike, for example, the silly and illogical anachronisms of the recent National Theatre “Othello”) And it was good to see the final-year students responding so well to expert directing – it’s always worth checking the “What’s On” sections of the major drama schools when you’re in London. You will almost certainly see tomorrow’s leading actors, primed and ready to be launched, in productions by fine practitioners – and tickets are always an encouragingly low price.
The fact that this play is set in the area of north east London where I live added for me lots of flavour and resonance, in a landscape of pylons, where minorities are demonised, gangsters are gunned down, and violence breaks out in the streets…
Finally, having exhorted you all to swarm to Hoe St E17 to witness the “Superman” musical at the Rose and Crown, I was delighted to learn it played to almost full houses during its last week, and indeed on Thursday I went along for a second viewing. Alas, I must confess to feeling quite frustrated, as I (and the friends I’d taken along) found the cast trying just that fraction too hard…Oh dear.
Success in a show involving lots of fun and comedy, and demanding lively audience response brings with it a MASSIVE pitfall. As a grey-beard local acting tutor and director I wanted to go round and remind the cast of the first dictum of playing comedy, which is to forget it’s funny…On the first night, as I reported, there was no hint at all of tongues in cheeks, we just watched characters totally in the moment of the drama, be it never so daft. The margin between this and playing the text in a spirit of “this bit’s really funny, folks, just watch me” is paper-thin, but the effect on the audience’s experience is corrosive, and undercuts weeks of dedicated work.
I hadn’t directed the show, I didn’t feel it was my place to dish out notes even as a friendly supporter, so if by chance you’re a performer reading this, for what it’s worth this comment is offered for future reference – free, gratis and for nothing. There’s lots more deathless theatrical wisdom available simply by visiting this blog’s website.